Chemotherapy and COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Multiple doses of vaccines against the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) provide patients with cancer the opportunity to continue cancer treatment. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer and the optimal timing of vaccination during chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 131 patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer who received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine were included in this study. This study combined two cohorts: an evaluation cohort of 79 patients receiving chemotherapy and a control cohort of 52 patients under follow-up after radical surgery. None of the patients had any history of COVID-19. Treatment- and vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded through outpatient interviews and self-reports. RESULTS: In the evaluation cohort, 62 patients (78.4%) experienced vaccine-related AEs after the first dose, and 62 patients (78.4%) experienced vaccine-related AEs with an increased rate of fever and fatigue after the second dose. In the control cohort, vaccine-related AEs occurred in 28 (53.8%) patients after the first dose and in 37 (71.2%) patients after the second dose, with increased fever and fatigue after the second dose. Of the 79 patients, 49 received chemotherapy before vaccination. Twelve patients (24.5%) changed their treatment schedule: four for safety reasons, four for myelosuppression, and four for convenience. Three patients discontinued the treatment because of disease progression. CONCLUSION: Systemic chemotherapy in patients with GI cancer does not have a markedly negative effect on COVID-19 vaccination, resulting in manageable vaccine-related AEs, and minimizing the need for treatment schedule changes.

The Efficacy of Immunotherapy and Clinical Utility of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Head and Neck.

Background and Objectives: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck is generally slow-growing but has a high potential for local recurrence and metastasis to distant organs. There is currently no standard pharmacological treatment for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) ACC, and there are cases in which immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are administered for ACC according to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the efficacy of ICIs for ACC remains unclear, and the predictive biomarkers need to be elucidated. Materials and Methods: The Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database enabled the retrospective but nationwide analysis of 263 cases of ACC of the head and neck. Then, we examined and reported four cases of ACC that received ICIs and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in our institution. Results: The C-CAT database revealed that 59 cases out of 263 received ICIs, and the best response was 8% of objective response rate (ORR) and 53% of disease control rate (DCR) (complete response, CR 3%, partial response, PR 5%, stable disease, SD 44%, progressive disease, PD 19%, not evaluated, NE 29%). The tumor mutational burden (TMB) in ACC was lower overall compared to HNSCC and could not be useful in predicting the efficacy of ICIs. Some cases with MYB structural variants showed the response to ICIs in the C-CAT database. A patient with MYB fusion/rearrangement variants in our institution showed long-term stable disease. Conclusions: ICI therapy is a potential treatment option, and the MYB structural variant might be a candidate for predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in patients with R/M ACC.

Clinical significance of Bacteroides fragilis as a potential prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis) is considered to act in an anti-inflammatory manner on the intestinal tract. On the contrary, enterotoxigenic B. fragilis (ETBF), a subtype of B. fragilis, produces an enterotoxin (BFT; B. fragilis toxin), leading to asymptomatic chronic infections and colonic tumor formation. However, the impact of B. fragilis and ETBF on the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. We aim to assess whether their presence affects the outcome in patients with CRC after curative resection. METHODS: We obtained 197 pairs of matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from cancerous and adjacent non-cancerous tissues of patients with pathological stage (pstage) II and III CRC after curative resection. The presence of B. fragilis and ETBF were estimated using real-time polymerase chain reaction, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: 16S rRNA for B. fragilis and bft DNA were detected in 120 (60.9%) and 12 (6.1%) of the 197 patients, respectively. B. fragilis-positive patients had better RFS than B. fragilis-negative patients, although that was not statistically significant. In subgroup analysis, better outcomes on RFS were observed in the presence of B. fragilis in pstage II and left-sided CRC. The association of B. fragilis positivity on OS was accentuated in the depth of T4 subgroup. No significant differences were observed in RFS and OS between ETBF and non-toxigenic B. fragilis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the presence of B. fragilis is associated with better outcomes in patients with pstage II and III CRC after curative resection.

Strategic Insight into the Combination Therapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The 5-year survival rate after curative resection is almost 80%, however, it is still less than satisfactory for metastatic CRC (mCRC). The combination approach including surgery, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy is a promising strategy due to its synergistic anticancer effect. Moreover, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has been reported to stratify the post-operative risk of recurrence, thus providing clinically valuable information for deciding to conduct adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, multiple new drugs that potentially target undruggable genes, including KRAS, have been developed. In this review, we discuss the current management of patients with mCRC and future perspectives in the light of a combination therapeutic strategy.

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Reveals Clinical Associations in Response to Immune Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) provides information regarding cancer-related genetic aberrations. However, its clinical utility in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNC) remains unknown. Additionally, predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) should be fully elucidated because of their low response rate. Here, we analyzed the clinical utility of CGP and identified predictive biomarkers that respond to ICIs in R/M HNC. We evaluated over 1100 cases of HNC using the nationwide genetic clinical database established by the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) and 54 cases in an institution-based study. The C-CAT database revealed that 23% of the cases were candidates for clinical trials, and 5% received biomarker-matched therapy, including NTRK fusion. Our institution-based study showed that 9% of SCC cases and 25% of salivary gland cancer cases received targeted agents. In SCC cases, the tumor mutational burden (TMB) high (≥10 Mut/Mb) group showed long-term survival (>2 years) in response to ICI therapy, whereas the PD-L1 combined positive score showed no significant difference in progression-free survival. In multivariate analysis, CCND1 amplification was associated with a lower response to ICIs. Our results indicate that CGP may be useful in identifying prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy in patients with HNC.

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Distinguishes Focal MET Amplification from Aneuploidy in Diverse Advanced Cancers.

Amplification (amp) of MET can be observed in cases of focal gene copy number gain, such as MET-driven amp, or with a gain of chromosome 7, such as aneuploidy. Several studies have shown that only high-level focal MET amp (MET/CEP7 ratio ≥5) is oncogenic, with such tumors responding to targeted therapy. However, there are few reports on how to distinguish between focal amplification and aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing (NGS). A total of 1025 patients with advanced solid tumors (typically pre-treated) were tested with a non-invasive comprehensive cfDNA NGS panel (Guardant360) from July 2014 to June 2019. Since bioinformatics upgrades of Guardant360 were undergoing in September 2018, focal MET amp was determined by our independent algorithm using the cohorts tested before September 2018 (291 patients), and validation was performed in the remaining cohort (734 patients). MET alterations (alts) associated with aberrant signaling were found in 110 patients (10.7%) among nine different cancer types, most commonly in non-small cell (12.2%, 62/510) and small cell (33.3%, 3/9) lung cancers, gastroesophageal cancer (19.4%, 7/36), and prostate adenocarcinoma (15.6%; 5/32). Among 291 patients tested before September 2018, 37 (12.7%) had MET alts. Among these, 24 (64.9%) had amps, 5 (13.5%) had exon 14 skipping, and 13 (35.1%) had single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Co-alterations, such as amp + SNVs, were found in four samples (10.8%). Among 24 MET amps, 29.2% (7/24) were focal according to our algorithm. MET copy number was significantly higher with focal amp compared to non-focal amp (mean copy number 3.26 vs. 2.44, respectively, p = 0.00304). In 734 patients tested after September 2018, our definition of focal MET amp was detected in 4.2% (31/734). Overall, focal amplification based on our algorithm was 3.7% (=38/1025). This study describes an approach to distinguish focal and non-focal MET amplification using comprehensive genomic profiling of cfDNA in advanced cancer patients. Focal MET amp accounted for ~30% of all MET amp, which was found in 3.7% of patients with diverse cancers and was associated with a higher plasma copy number. Clinical studies are warranted to assess the clinical utility of targeted therapies for tumors with focal MET amplification detected by NGS of cfDNA.

Potential Molecular Cross Talk Among CCR5 Pathway Predicts Regorafenib Responsiveness in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Genetic variants in the CCL5/CCR5 pathway have been shown to predict regorafenib efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study investigated the biological role of CCL4 and CCL3 gene polymorphisms in patients with refractory mCRC treated using regorafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the genomic DNA extracted from mCRC patients receiving regorafenib. Serum factor levels at baseline, day 21, and progressive disease (PD) were measured using ELISA. RESULTS: Decreased CCL4 levels at day 21 or increased CCL3 levels at PD were associated with better clinical outcomes. In patients with any CCL5 rs2280789 G allele, CCL3 significantly increased between BL and day 21 compared with the A/A variant (72.7% vs. 23.1%, p=0.006), but CCL4 decreased (31.8% vs. 69.2%, p=0.043). CONCLUSION: Increased CCL3 and decreased CCL4 seen in specific genotypes may serve as potential biomarkers of regorafenib in mCRC patients.

Associations among plasma concentrations of regorafenib and its metabolites, adverse events, and ABCG2 polymorphisms in patients with metastatic colorectal cancers.

PURPOSE: The association between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of regorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, remains unclear. This study assessed the trough plasma concentrations (Ctrough) of regorafenib and its N-oxide (M2) and N-oxide/desmethyl (M5) metabolites, and evaluated the associations among these levels, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic-related genetic polymorphisms in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: The Ctrough levels of regorafenib and its metabolites were assessed in a single-center, prospective, observational study, 7 days after the initial treatment. The correlation between those values and adverse events was then examined. In addition, the genetic polymorphisms of ABCG2, SLCO1B1, and UGT1A9 were determined and evaluated for associations with the levels of regorafenib, M2, and M5. RESULTS: We analyzed 43 patients who received regorafenib 40-120 mg/day; among them, 35 patients started at 120 mg/day. With regard to bilirubin increase, the Ctrough values of regorafenib were significantly higher in the group with grade ≥ 2 than in groups with grades 0 and 1 (p = 0.010). The M5 Ctrough levels were significantly associated with the severity of hypertension or rash (p < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, the M5 Ctrough values and age were significant predictors of severe rash. Lastly, significant differences were noted in the M5 concentration-to-dose ratio values between the patients with ABCG2 421A/A and ABCG2 421C/A or C/C polymorphisms (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the Ctrough of regorafenib was associated with bilirubin increase, and also clarified for the first time that the Ctrough of M5 was significantly correlated with hypertension and severe rash.

Clinical significance of enterocyte-specific gene polymorphisms as candidate markers of oxaliplatin-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be classified into subtypes based on gene expression signatures. Patients with stage III enterocyte subtype of the CRC Assigner classifier have been shown to benefit from oxaliplatin adjuvant therapy. Here, we investigated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in two enterocyte subtype-related genes, MS4A12 and CDX2, could predict the efficacy of oxaliplatin in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). Three cohorts of patients were included: a discovery cohort receiving FOLFOX ± bevacizumab (BEV) (n = 146), a validation cohort receiving FOLFOXIRI + BEV (n = 230), and a control cohort receiving FOLFIRI + BEV (n = 228). SNPs were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. In the discovery cohort, MS4A12 rs4939378 and CDX2 rs3812863 were identified as potential markers of efficacy. In the validation cohort, any G allele of MS4A12 rs4939378 was associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) than the A/A variant in both univariate analysis (12.4 vs. 10.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.99, P = 0.033) and multivariable analysis (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.44-0.97, P = 0.035) in patients expressing wild-type KRAS, but not mutant KRAS. In contrast, longer PFS was observed for patients expressing the CDX2 rs3812863 G/G variant than any A allele in univariate analysis (32.3 vs. 10.3 months, HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.19-0.81, P = 0.004) only in patients expressing mutant KRAS. These findings were not observed in the control cohort. Thus, MS4A12 and CDX2 SNPs may have utility as predictive biomarkers of response to oxaliplatin-based treatment in mCRC patients.

Role of enterocyte-specific gene polymorphisms in response to adjuvant treatment for stage III colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The enterocyte subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC) responds favorably to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant treatment for stage III CRC. We examined the clinical significance of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in enterocyte-related genes MS4A12 and CDX2 in response to adjuvant treatment for stage III CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 350 patients with stage III CRC were included: 274 received adjuvant treatment with surgical resection (discovery cohort) and 76 received surgery alone (control cohort). In the discovery cohort, 68 patients received FOLFOX and 206 received oral fluoropyrimidine. SNPs were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. RESULTS: In the discovery cohort, the MS4A12 rs4939378 G/G variant was associated with lower 5-year survival than any A allele [70% vs. 90%, univariate: hazard ratio (HR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-5.06, P = 0.035; multivariate: HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.15-5.76, P = 0.021]. Patients with the CDX2 rs3812863 G/G variant had better overall survival than those with any A allele, although this was not significant in multivariate analysis (5 year-survival: 95% vs. 82%, univariate: HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.97, P = 0.034; multivariate: HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.13-1.11, P = 0.078). The SNPs did not show significant association with overall survival in the control cohort, and significant interaction was observed between MS4A12 genotypes and groups (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that MS4A12 and CDX2 gene polymorphisms may predict outcome in stage III CRC. However, the clinical significance of SNPs for response to oxaliplatin may differ by tumor stage.

Serum IL-8 level as a candidate prognostic marker of response to anti-angiogenic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Liver metastasis (LM) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here, we investigated the prognostic utility of several serum factors in mCRC patients with or without LM who were treated with anti-angiogenic agents in first-line (FL) or salvage-line (SL) settings. METHODS: A combined cohort of 125 patients was analyzed in this single institute pooled analysis: FL cohort receiving bevacizumab (n = 71) and SL cohort receiving regorafenib (n = 54). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL) and during treatment, and serum factors were measured by ELISA. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression methods. RESULTS: In univariate analysis of the combined cohort, right-sided CRC, primary unresected tumor, wild-type KRAS, LM, ≥ 2 metastatic sites, and SL were associated with shorter OS; in multivariable analysis, LM and SL remained significant. Serum angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) levels ≥ 2190.3 pg/ml and interleukin (IL)-8 levels ≥ 15.1 pg/ml at BL were significantly associated with LM. Using these cut-off values, patients with higher Ang-2 or IL-8 levels at BL had shorter OS than those with lower BL levels (Ang-2: hazard ratio [HR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-4.51, P = 0.001; IL-8: HR 4.31, 95%CI 2.11-8.79, P < 0.001). High serum IL-8 level remained a significant predictor of shorter OS in multivariable analysis (HR 3.24, 95%CI 1.47-7.16, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Circulating IL-8 and Ang-2 levels are associated with LM in mCRC patients. IL-8 may be a prognostic marker of response to anti-angiogenic therapy, regardless of the treatment timing.

Managing a gastrointestinal oncology practice in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: single institutional experience in The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared to be a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. On April 7, 2020, a state of emergency was declared in Japan, as had been by other nations worldwide. This unprecedented crisis has profound implications for patients undergoing chemotherapy and for practicing healthcare professionals. Various reports have shown data indicating that cancer patients with COVID-19 have high morbidity and mortality rates. In order to reduce the use of medical resources to avoid the risk of COVID-19 infections in both cancer patients and health care providers, oncologists now have to draw the line for cancer treatments by maintaining their efficacy while avoiding severe adverse events. In this article, we outlined the decisions made regarding the practice of gastrointestinal oncology in our institution during the COVID pandemic.

A polymorphism in the cachexia-associated gene INHBA predicts efficacy of regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Activin/myostatin signaling has a critical role not only in cachexia but also in tumor angiogenesis. Cachexia is a frequent complication among patients with advanced cancer and heavily pretreated patients. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of cachexia-associated genetic variants in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with regorafenib. Associations between twelve single nucleotide polymorphisms in 8 genes (INHBA, MSTN, ALK4, TGFBR1, ALK7, ACVR2B, SMAD2, FOXO3) and clinical outcome were evaluated in mCRC patients of three cohorts: a discovery cohort of 150 patients receiving regorafenib, a validation cohort of 80 patients receiving regorafenib and a control cohort of 128 receiving TAS-102. In the discovery cohort, patients with any G variant in FOXO3 rs12212067 had a significantly lower response rate (P = 0.031) and overall survival (OS) than those with a T/T in univariate analysis (4.5 vs. 7.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-2.46, P = 0.012). Among female patients, those with any G variant in INHBA rs2237432 had a significantly longer OS than those with an A/A in both univariate (7.6 vs. 4.3 months, HR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.34-0.95, P = 0.021) and multivariable (HR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.29-0.94, adjusted P = 0.031) analysis. This association was confirmed in female patients of the validation cohort, though without statistical significance (P = 0.059). Conversely, female patients with any G allele in the control group receiving TAS-102 did not show a longer OS. This was the first study evaluating the associations between polymorphisms in cachexia-associated genes and outcomes in refractory mCRC patients treated with regorafenib. Further studies should be conducted to confirm these associations.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in MiRNA Binding Sites of Nucleotide Excision Repair-Related Genes Predict Clinical Benefit of Oxaliplatin in FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab: Analysis of the TRIBE Trial.

BACKGROUND: The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway participates in platinum-induced DNA damage repair. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in miRNA-binding sites in the NER genes RPA2 and GTF2H1 are associated with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we analyzed whether RPA2 and GTF2H1 SNPs predict the efficacy of oxaliplatin in metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples from 457 patients with mCRC enrolled in the TRIBE trial, which compared first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (BEV) (n = 230, discovery cohort) and first-line FOLFIRI plus BEV (n = 227, control cohort). SNPs were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. RESULTS: In the FOLFOXIRI + BEV-treated cohort expressing wild-type KRAS, progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter for the RPA2 rs7356 C/C variant subgroup than the any T allele subgroup in univariate analysis (9.1 versus 13.3 months respectively, hazard ratio (HR) 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-5.03, p = 0.020) and this remained significant in multivariable analysis (HR 2.97, 95%CI: 1.27-6.94, p = 0.012). A similar trend was observed for overall survival. In contrast, patients expressing mutant RAS and RPA2 rs7356 C/C variant had longer PFS with FOLFOXIRI + BEV than with FOLFIRI + BEV (12.1 versus 7.6 months, HR 0.23, 95%CI: 0.09-0.62, p = 0.002) but no superiority of FOLFOXIRI + BEV was observed for the RAS mutant, RPA2 rs7356 any T variant subgroup (11.7 versus 9.6 months, HR 0.77, 95%CI: 0.56-1.07, p = 0.12) or the RAS wild-type, RPA2 rs7356 C/C variant subgroup. CONCLUSION: RPA2 SNPs may serve as predictive and prognostic markers of oxaliplatin responsiveness in a RAS status-dependent manner in mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI + BEV.

Clinical utility of polyethylene glycol conjugated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) for preventing severe neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of polyethylene glycol conjugated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) for preventing neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients that received fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab (Bev) in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed mCRC patients who received FOLFOXIRI plus Bev between December 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated the efficacy of PEG-G-CSF as preventing or treating grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, the overall response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events of FOLFOXIRI plus Bev based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients (median age 53.5 years) were included. The ORR rate was 65.3%, the median PFS was 9.6 months (7.2-16.9), and the median OS was 24.2 months (13.6-NA). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 53.8% of the patients, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 7.7%. PEG-G-CSF was given to 77.0% of the patients, including prophylactically (n = 9) and after the development of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (n = 11). No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia after the administration of PEG-G-CSF. In seven of the nine patients who received PEG-G-CSF prophylactically (77.8%), no dose adjustment was required. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-G-CSF is useful in preventing severe neutropenia in mCRC patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus Bev.

A polymorphism within the R-spondin 2 gene predicts outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab: data from FIRE-3 and TRIBE trials.

BACKGROUND: Through enhancement of the Wnt signalling pathway, R-spondins are oncogenic drivers in colorectal cancer. Experimental data suggest that the R-spondin/Wnt axis stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent angiogenesis. We therefore hypothesise that variations within R-spondin genes predict outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with upfront FOLFIRI and bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 773 patients with mCRC enrolled in the randomised phase III FIRE-3 and TRIBE trials and receiving either FOLFIRI/bevacizumab (training and validation cohorts) or FOLFIRI/cetuximab (control group) were involved in this study. The impact of six functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the R-spondin 1-3 genes on outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: RAS and KRAS wild-type patients harbouring any G allele of the RSPO2 rs555008 SNP had a longer overall survival compared with those having a TT genotype in both the training (FIRE-3) and validation (TRIBE) cohorts (29.0 vs 23.6 months, P = 0.009 and 37.8 vs 19.4 months, P = 0.021 for RAS wild-type patients and 28.4 vs 22.3 months, P = 0.011 and 36.0 vs 23.3 months, P = 0.046 for KRAS wild-type patients). Conversely, any G allele carriers with KRAS and RAS mutant tumours exhibited a shorter progression-free survival compared with TT genotype carriers, whereas the results were clinically more evident for KRAS mutant patients in both the training and validation cohorts (8.1 vs 11.2 months, P = 0.023 and 8.7 vs 10.3 months, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Genotyping of the RSPO2 rs555008 polymorphism may help to select patients who will derive the most benefit from FOLFIRI/bevacizumab dependent on (K)RAS mutational status.

Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting.

BACKGROUND: Different approaches are used to treat resectable tumours in patients having adenocarcinoma at the oesophagogastrointestinal junction (EGJ) or in the stomach. However, there is limited information about treatment efficacy for patients at metastatic stage. A recent molecular analysis of upper gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma revealed that the anatomical location can influence the molecular backgrounds of tumours. This study sought to elucidate whether different therapeutic approaches should be used for EGJ tumours relative to those in the stomach. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institute in Japan. Patients having metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma in the EGJ or stomach who underwent platinum doublet chemotherapy between January 2007 and August 2014 were enrolled. Patients in the EGJ tumour group had tumours having an epicentre within 2 cm proximal or 5 cm distal to the estimated anatomical EGJ and cardia. RESULTS: Among 378 consecutively enrolled patients, 61 were grouped into the EGJ group and the remainder comprised the stomach group. The EGJ group had more men and lower incidence of diffuse type and Borrmann type IV tumours and peritoneum metastasis compared with the stomach group. The median overall survival of patients in the EGJ and stomach groups was similar (17.3 months (95% CI 13.5 to 23.2) vs 14.5 months (95% CI 13.3 to 16.4)). No statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival. Although the overall postprogression survival differed significantly between the EGJ and stomach groups (8.2 months (95% CI 5.7 to 12.7) vs 7.1 months (95% CI 6.1 to 7.8)), on grouping patients by histological type, the two groups exhibited similar postprogression survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diffuse-type histology, higher serum CA19-9 levels and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Different clinicopathological features of EGJ adenocarcinoma were not associated with clinical outcomes of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Histological subtype rather than anatomical location has more significance for treatment decisions for advanced gastric cancers.

Changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio during nivolumab monotherapy are associated with gastric cancer survival.

PURPOSE: In the ATTRACTION-2 trial, nivolumab significantly improved the survival of advanced gastric cancer patients. The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is prognostic in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat various cancers. However, a few reports have explored the relationships between NLR changes during ICI treatment and patient survival. Here, we evaluated factors (including NLR changes in patients on nivolumab monotherapy) prognostic for gastric cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 98 gastric cancer patients who received nivolumab (3 mg/kg or 240 mg/body bi-weekly) at our institution between December 2014 and September 2018. We evaluated pretreatment data, and those obtained 30 and 60 days after treatment commenced. We explored the prognostic utility of relative NLR changes in terms of the overall survival (OS) of patients on nivolumab monotherapy. RESULTS: Over a median of 4.9 months of follow-up, 98 gastric cancer patients received a median of four treatment courses. The overall response and disease-control rates were 25% and 52%, respectively. The median OS was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-9.1). On multivariate analysis, factors poorly prognostic in terms of OS were an ECOG performance status of 0-1, a pretreatment NLR > 3, and an NLR difference ≧ 2 over the 60 days before and after nivolumab administration (∆NLR60). Patients with ∆NLR60 values < 2 survived significantly longer than did those with ∆NLR60 values ≧ 2 (median OS 9.2 months [95% CI 6.4-11.6] vs. 4.0 months [2.1-4.9]; P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab monotherapy was efficacious in gastric cancer patients. NLR changes during such therapy may be predictive of outcomes.

A phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of trifluridine/tipiracil and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: LUPIN study.

Background The effectiveness of reintroducing oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to both oxaliplatin and irinotecan was previously reported in a phase II study (RE-OPEN). We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with refractory mCRC. Patients and Methods Three dosages of intravenous oxaliplatin (50, 65 and 85 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and a fixed dose of FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 twice daily (bid) on days 1-5 and 15-19 every 4 weeks were investigated in patients with refractory mCRC using a 3 + 3 design. Eligible patients had received prior oxaliplatin-based treatment that achieved a response or stable disease followed by confirmed disease progression at least 6 months before entering the study. Results Twelve patients were enrolled in the study. Three of six patients in the oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 cohort had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) with treatment delays during the second cycle at ≥8 days due to grade ≥ 2 neutropenia or grade 2 AST/ALT increased. No DLTs were observed in the other cohorts. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), anorexia (n = 1), and nausea (n = 1). There was no evidence of allergic reaction to oxaliplatin or severe peripheral sensory neuropathy. Conclusions A combination of FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 bid on days 1-5 and 15-19 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks could be a suitable regimen for the recommended dose of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin in patients with refractory mCRC.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA expression: A potential molecular escape mechanism from regorafenib.

Regorafenib has improved the survival of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet the mechanisms of inherited or acquired resistance are not well understood. A total of 50 patients with refractory mCRC were enrolled. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration was carried out at baseline, day 21 after initiation of regorafenib, and at the time of progression of disease (PD) using the CellSearch System (Veridex LLC, NJ, USA). Poly(A) mRNA was extracted from CTCs, and gene expression of epithelial and epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers was analyzed by a multiplex-PCR based DNA Chip. Patients with fewer than 3 CTCs at baseline and day 21 had a longer progression-free survival than those with 3 or more CTCs (3.3 vs 2.0 months, P = .008 and 3.3 vs 2.0 months, P = .004, respectively). Patients with fewer than 3 CTCs at baseline and day 21 had a longer overall survival (OS) than those with 3 or more CTCs (10.0 vs 4.6 months, P < .001 and 8.7 vs 3.8 months, P = .003, respectively). In multivariable analysis, CTC counts remained significantly associated with OS at baseline and day 21 (P = .019 and P = .028). Circulating tumor cell EGFR gene expression was upregulated at day 21 and/or PD in 64% of patients. Patients had significantly increased EGFR expression at PD compared to baseline (P = .041) and at day 21 and/or PD compared to baseline (P = .004). Our findings suggest that CTC count and EGFR expression could be useful markers of regorafenib efficacy and outcomes. Upregulation of CTC EGFR expression might be a molecular escape mechanism under regorafenib therapy.